Train Climb

Blog · Training

Linear, undulating or block: which periodisation fits climbers?

Three popular ways to organise training compared honestly, with climbing examples and a reminder that the best model is the one you can follow.

· · updated · 3 min read

Cover illustration for “Linear, undulating or block: which periodisation fits climbers?”

Once you accept that training should be organised over time, the next question is how. Three families of models come up again and again: linear (traditional), undulating and block. Each has fans, and each can work for climbers. Here is a fair comparison.

Linear (traditional) periodisation

This is the model associated with Matveyev and later developed by Bompa. Training starts with high volume and lower intensity, then gradually shifts towards lower volume and higher intensity as the main event approaches.

Climbing example: eight weeks of lots of moderate routes and general strength, then six weeks of limit bouldering and finger strength, then four weeks of power and route-specific efforts before a trip.

For members

Log in to read the rest

This 3-minute article is for people with a Train Climb account.

Log in Request access

More on training

Cover illustration for “Sport periodisation in plain words”

Training · · Members

Sport periodisation in plain words

Periodisation sounds academic, but the idea is simple: organise training over time so you get better and peak when it matters. Here is what it means for climbers.

3 min read